Barcas Präsident Sandro Rosell wird im Zusammenhang mit dem Transfer Unterschlagung vorgeworfen. Vom Verein vorgelegte Dokumente unterstützten religious woman „Zweifel, bite the dust ihm Rahmen des Transfers geäußert wurden", sagte Staatsanwalt Jose Perals in einer Mitteilung und beantragte eine Untersuchung durch Spaniens höchstes Strafgericht.
What's more, as of late Barcelona, roused by the splendid Lionel Messi, figured out how to accomplish untouchable status on the pitch in the meantime as staying consistent with that saying.
At the point when forward Neymar joined from the Brazilian group Santos last June, Barcelona said they paid an aggregate of £48.6m.
In any case, one of their individuals, a drug specialist called Jordi Cases, asked the club whether this was extremely the last bill. At the point when Barcelona declined to reply, he went to the Spanish courts who propelled an examination.
Starting there on the story truly started to disentangle. To start with the Spanish prosecutor said they would explore the arrangement to check whether the club had cheated the treasury of unpaid expense.
The club said they don't had anything to cover up yet then in January, under serious open weight, the club's leader Sandro Rosell surrendered.
He said it was for individual reasons yet Rosell had by and by administered the mission to arrive the 22-year-old, one of the most blazing properties in world football.
Not long after Rosell's takeoff, his successor Josep Maria Bartomeu, called a news meeting to uncover the genuine cost of marking Neymar was really £71.5m.
In a phenomenal move, Bartomeu - a nearby partner and companion of Rosell who was VP at the season of the marking - went further, clarifying precisely where all the cash had gone.
There was a £33m pay charge paid to Neymar's dad to guarantee he joined Barcelona.
Santos got £14m.
Be that as it may, there was additionally a £8m marking on charge, a £6m expense for taking a choice on future Santos players, £2m in specialists expenses (likewise paid to Neymar's dad) and a further £2m to Neymar's beneficent establishment in Brazil.
The club likewise uncovered that Neymar was being paid £9m a year in compensation.
The numbers are mind boggling.
Furthermore, I can't review a noteworthy European club consistently opening the books on a move along these lines. It gives a captivating understanding into the kind of assentions and installments groups need to make to secure the best players - particularly from South America where numerous stars are claimed by organizations and well off people instead of clubs.
By unwrapping the arrangement openly, Barcelona trusted that the issue and the Spanish courts would leave.
On the off chance that anything it just added to their assurance to examine the exchange and two weeks prior the judge Pablo Ruz reported the case would proceed.
That incited Barcelona to pay £11m to the Spanish treasury as a "complimentary assessment affirmation".
But then the issue just won't leave with Barcelona as yet confronting the genuine probability of explaining themselves in court. The legal counselor for Jordi Cases has told the BBC he trusts the case will at present proceed.
It's a genuine wreckage and one that has without a doubt hurt the club's picture.
No big surprise they are on a global appeal hostile and on Monday I asked Bartomeu how he and his board can start to reestablish Barcelona's notoriety.
"It's our commitment to disclose to everyone that we did everything in the best possible way," he said.
"It's humiliating in light of the fact that we think we are correct. We are not content with the circumstance but rather we will guard our club unequivocally when the judge will call us to proclaim."
Bartomeu claims the question comes down to a difference over who is in charge of a portion of the duty on the different assentions and contracts. Would it be advisable for it to be paid by Neymar's dad in Brazil, or in Spain in light of the fact that those installments constitute some portion of the agreement with the player?
So why pay the Spanish treasury £11m now?
Bartomeu proceeded with: "We paid as a result of reasonability and in light of the fact that there is a conceivable diverse understanding. For us this is foolish and an uncalled for circumstance."
I solicited him whether the rising up out of clubs like Manchester City and Paris St-Germain, which are possessed by super rich advocates, was making it harder for a club like Barcelona to contend?
"It's more troublesome - over the most recent couple of years a few clubs create the impression that are claimed by one individual that occasionally have boundless sources and at Barca we don't have boundless sources.
"Obviously we are a major club. We are the greatest club on the planet yet when we rival boundless sources we need to discover different ways, different methodologies."
0 comments:
Post a Comment